Tory Bexley approves tougher action on private landlords than Labour Greenwich

Bexley Council have just approved plans to license and regulate all private landlords in the worst-hit wards for anti-social behaviour in the borough.

This means (amazingly) that Conservative controlled Bexley Council will have stricter rules in some areas on private landlords than Labour Greenwich, which has been extremely slow to take action on private landlords.

Lewisham adopted similar measures to Bexley in January.

New build flats often bought up by buy-to-let landlords

Selective licensing will be in operation for all private rentals in Erith, Thamesmead North, Abbey Wood/Lower Belvedere and Manor Road.

HMO licensing

The number of people living in private rented flats has increased exponentially in recent years with 30% of Greenwich residents now doing so – and their rights are limited.

Under current rules local authorities can licence all Homes of Multiple Occupation as well as up to 20% of private lettings that aren’t HMOs.

Greenwich Council belatedly decided to license HMOs due to a huge number of issues, though after three months only 2.9% of HMO landlords had registered.

They have never agreed to the further measure of licensing up to 20% of other private dwellings despite many issues in single occupancy private rentals and there is no mention of it is included within their 2018 manifesto.

Formally 100% of private dwellings that could be licensed alongside HMOs until the Conservatives in central government capped it at 20%.

Not great – but Greenwich Council never showed much interest in adopting the power before it was reduced, and not much since despite many other Labour councils doing so.

Labour in Greenwich claim to be fighting against poor landlords including in their election manifesto alongside blaming central government for many issues despite not utilising powers they do possess.

Labour in Bexley meanwhile is arguing to license all landlords.

Bexley landlords will face fines of £30,000 if they do not register when the scheme is introduced in September.

Tax evasion

Greenwich’s refusal to license all landlords is odd as the evidence in borough’s where it has been adopted shows that mass tax evasion is ongoing. Newham Council gained £3.1 million extra income since introduction and it’s estimated that landlords not reporting income to HMRC in Newham alone are costing £200 million in unpaid taxes – and that’s just in one authority.

Landlords pricing out the young

Permissive regimes for landlords with few regulations and tax breaks – if tax paid at all – has been a major factor in housing speculation which has pushed prices up massively and priced out many younger people.

As landlords have been able to price out first-time buyers other issues have arisen. Most private rentals are six-month to one-year contracts meaning that tenants have very little security or ability to plan for the future.

Constantly having to move is the result – with transient communities replacing people with roots in an area. Community bonds break down. Families have to move their kids from schools.

Anti-social behaviour increases as the merry-go-round of tenants meaning furniture thrown out every year as tenants leave with fly tipping increasing.

Private tenants also tend to maintain or improve homes far less than homeowners with a financial stake or social tenants with long term contracts.

Why fix that window or paint a door if having to move out soon and never sure how long they can remain in a property? With many private landlords failing to upkeep property, areas enter a circle of decline.

Lower prices down the line?

Scare tactics of certain landlords claiming that rents will increase has not materialised in other boroughs. Tenants can simply not afford higher rents in many areas.

Some landlords will probably sell over a period of time which should increase supply and lower prices. Many tenants now forced to rent will then be able to buy.

Whilst respectable landlords may complain the sheer number of irresponsible landlords has led to this point. With council finances stretched enforcement is tough without schemes to raise income and monitor the sector. We are talking about one of the fundamentals of life after all – a decent roof over one’s head.

Council’s can also now use arms-length housing companies to build higher numbers of social homes to increase options alongside regulating the private sector.

Lack of action from Labour Greenwich means they are now in a position on private landlords which not only lags behind many Labour councils but a neighbouring Tory borough.

Pretty incredible stuff.

Help the site by donating at

Or you can use the new Ko-Fi service here 




Running a site alone takes time and a fair bit of money. Adverts are far from enough to cover it and my living costs as a private renter.

You can support me including via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

    4 thoughts on “Tory Bexley approves tougher action on private landlords than Labour Greenwich

    • Licensing landlords isn’t going to improve anti-social behaviour, it will just move it to another area as the landlords move such people out. This is probably their aim, if they were concerned about tax evasion, pricing out the young etc. they’d introduce it to all their wards.

      “Some landlords will probably sell over a period of time which should increase supply and lower prices. Many tenants now forced to rent will then be able to buy.” Oh? How much are you expecting prices to lower by to be affordable for many?

      • It depends on the type of anti-social behaviour. I’ve seen first hand tenants being told to move out ASAP and leaving beds, wardrobes which landlords then dump. Sometimes tenants leave it outside too. Income can bolster staff to investigate those doing this. Ultimately much of that wouldn’t happen if secure, long term housing were not a diminishing resource.

        As for coverage – Bexley cannot do it in all wards. 20% is the maximum allowed by central Government

      • As for house prices, a return to the norm in terms of average wage to average house price ratio as seen from the 1950s to early 2000s would be welcome. Its now two to three times that in London. Many tools needed to get there, and this is but one.

    • Great news.

      The amount of well cared for homes that have become wrecks since landlords bought them is becoming an epidemic.

      I feel for the young who have little chance of buying as things stand and forced to pay extortionate rents to too many dodgy landlords who are pocketing money purely for owning (and not maintaining) homes and were lucky enough to be able to buy when prices were cheaper AND given tax breaks to boot.

      The tide has turned too much and more and more voters are forced to rent.

      There’s some good landlords out there but too many dodgy ones and councils need money to investigate them. If this gets them out the game and causes a glut of supply on the market causing a price drop to help younger buyers then its all good.

      Wise landlords would probably get out now.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.