Greenwich Planning Board block Woolwich Tesco Tower

Greenwich’s Planning Board turned down a 27-floor tower outside Woolwich Tesco last night.

The move was expected after Greenwich planning officers recommended refusal.

However, as covered on this site, prior action by Greenwich Council ensure any appeal has a better chance of succeeding. A 2016 masterplan covering the site capped heights at 15 floors yet was scrapped by Greenwich Council after two rounds of consultation and over £124,000 spent. No reason ever given except a new one would be drawn up – which is too late for this site.

Also, outline planning permission was given for a tower a decade ago on the site.

The first phase won the carbunckle cup – especially for this facade

Both these actions possibly give developer Meyer Homes a good chance when (or if) they appeal. They will argue that a precedent has been set 10 years ago – and with no masterplan for the site and other tall buildings nearby – any inspector may let it pass.

Local group Speak Out Woolwich has campaigned against the tower and the low amount of social homes the entire development would provide – which also includes land to the rear. Around 1,600 people had signed a petition.

Running a site alone takes time and a fair bit of money. Adverts are far from enough to cover it and my living costs as a private renter.

You can support me including via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

    4 thoughts on “Greenwich Planning Board block Woolwich Tesco Tower

    • I’ve seen you reiterate this point about the failed Masterplan allowing for the inspectorate to overturn LB Greenwich’s decision. I don’t see why this is the case – there are numerous other planning issues associated with this tower which would result in the refusal being upheld.

      • It’s one very important safe guard now gone for no apparent reason. The others may well be strong enough for the planning inspectorate – or not, particularly if Waterfront replacement plans on the Wilko site are tall.

    • I agree, its’ absurd that it was scrapped – will be interesting to see how their appeal goes down at the Lewisham Tesco site. Yes, hopefully they will be made to reduce heights there – but with Saidq, high density is the new modus operandi.

    • If there isn’t a high enough quotient of affordable homes, the Mayor may well reject the appeal.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.