High housebuilding levels bring in £54 million to Greenwich Council – what is the New Homes Bonus?
A fund has brought large sums of money into Greenwich Council’s coffers in recent years. The current year’s total was recently announced by central government at £13.7 million and brings the total to more than £54 million since the fund commenced in 2011/12. But what is it, and where is it going?
Back in 2011 the coalition government established a scheme called the New Homes Bonus that brings in money depending on the number of homes built in each authority. A bonus is paid in addition if homes are “affordable”.
This has brought increasing sums to Greenwich Council as the authority has some of the highest building levels across the UK.
Local Government has seen very heavy cuts in their budget in recent years. There’s little doubt of the effects in various areas,but there have been some new sources of income too, and one of them is this fund.
Here’s a breakdown of income per year:
- 2011/12 – £924,000
- 2012/13 – £3.15 million
- 2013/14 – £5.8 million
- 2014/15 – £7.6 million
- 2015/16 – £10.8 million
- 2016/17 – £13.5 million
- 2017/18 – £13.7 million
The current year’s sum is in the top 10 of 356 authorities nationwide.
Looking at other local authority income from this fund shows Greenwich is receiving healthy totals with its £13.7 million this year:
- Lewisham will receive £10.1 million.
- Bexley – £3.9 million.
- Newham – £11.4 million
- Southwark – £12.8 million.
These are clearly big sums for councils and yet many people seem unaware of this money. Government advice is for local authorities to consult on spending priorities but I cannot recall Greenwich Council, for one, ever doing this. Have they?
The money isn’t ringfenced so can cover various areas. One obvious priority would be increasingly the numbers of staff in the Planning Department.
More homes equals more income which means Greenwich encouraging more applications through things such as the Core Strategy, which foresees the third highest numbers of homes out of 33 London authorities.
Unfortunately, as we’ve seen through a litany of recent Greenwich Council Planning Department failures costing residents dear, deep problems exist within the department and extra income dating back years doesn’t seem to have alleviated problems.
Some of the cash is now taken by the Greater London Authority and the pooled sum goes towards a fund for councils to bid towards. Unfortunately Greenwich Council have missed out on winning many bids due to a lamentable record in this area.
Couple that to a Planning Department, amongst others, not utilising Section 106 payments to improve areas to any great degree and areas aren’t benefiting from high levels of housebuilding.
Section 106 payments also brought in around £11.4 million in 2015/16, as covered here. So in that year new construction brought in £26.2 million through NHB and S106.
Income will possibly increase if anything in coming years.
Running a site alone takes time and a fair bit of money. Adverts are far from enough to cover it and my living costs as a private renter.
You can support me including via Paypal here Another option is via Patreon by clicking here You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here There's also a Facebook page for the site here Many thanks
And still poor areas are left to rot in midst of expensive new builds
Although we welcome all the new homes being built in the Royal Borough of Greenwich which are needed to meet the housing shortage. Many residents would like to see a little more investment to upgrade the existing housing estates built in the 1920’s 1930’s 1940’s and early 1950’s many of which are houses. These homes need to be made more energy efficient
Most of the estates built since the 1960’s have either been demolished or due to be demolished to be re-developed,
Ive long known that section 106 brought money that Greenwich and its councillors (Labour!) never used on poorer areas but hearing about this addititional cash makes me more angry.
What excuse is there for the rotten state of so much public housing both inside and out (and parks and shopping areas) when theyre cheek by jowl to developments that have brought millions and they never benefit.
I can’t believe a Labour council would do this. Many councillors don’t deserve the party membership.
I know some of this cash is to make up issues in areas like social care (though so did this years 5% council tax rise) but many people moving into expensive developments are not heavy users of social care so aren’t adding much strain. So where’s the cash going?
Pingback: Three new shops planned for Plumstead Scout Hall site – FromTheMurkyDepths
Pingback: Controversial new Greenwich school moving forward – FromTheMurkyDepths
Pingback: Greenwich Council appoint project manager for Woolwich Creative District at cost of £309,390 – FromTheMurkyDepths
Pingback: Greenwich council regeneration meeting tonight – FromTheMurkyDepths
Pingback: Revealed: Greenwich Council sitting on many millions of pounds for years from new developments – FromTheMurkyDepths
Pingback: £11.9 million payday to Greenwich Council from New Homes Bonus scheme | Murky Depths