Plumstead High Street: £5.2 million improvement project sees overruns and questions over quality

After years of complaints over the poor condition of Plumstead High Street – plus locals creating their own political party – Greenwich Council appeared to finally wake up a few years back and embark on improvement plans.

That saw a £5.2 million project announced to make the High Street a better experience to those on foot, helping businesses and creating a market in the listed Plumstead power station.

The project was to be jointly funded by the Mayor of London’s Good Growth Fund and Greenwich Council.




However, it hasn’t gone too well so far with more than half the total fund already spent, with people now are asking about the quality of what has been built.

Tarmac a short term issue, though paving type used is pretty cheap

An area in front of Poundland on Plumstead High Street has seen new paving which includes an almost continual puddle/lake due to poor drainage.

It also looks nothing like proposals previously seen:

Proposed changes in area

Another project is greenery outside Tesco. Considering how Greenwich maintain other public space will it promptly become an eyesore?

New landscaping in Abbey Wood. Neither Bexley nor Greenwich borough maintain. This is on Greenwich side of boundary.

When the authority became spooked by people possibly voting for some others, they also embarked on deep cleaning the High Street. That pretty quickly stopped with machines mothballed after just a couple of years.

High Street greenery

As part of the current £5.2m scheme, proposals to alter green space further towards the station are also running late. It was due to start in Autumn 2021.

Proposal

If we rewind to last year concerns were being expressed by councillors to Greenwich Council officers about what is – and isn’t – being done.

Plumstead councillors asked probing questions in a regeneration meeting held in July 2022 about why much of the High Street’s public space now appears set to see no money spent.

Failure to revise CIL rate alongside S106 allocation decision ensures no improvement to pedestrian links

Cllr Lakshan Saldin (Labour – Charlton Hornfair) asked about funding and sought greater detail on costings.

As of now, Greenwich Officers have still not responded to those questions after stating an update would be forthcoming. I’ve checked every meeting held since. It’s always the same; it’s “pending”.

Where’s money been spent?

During the meeting some questions just weren’t answered. Cllr Nas Asghar (Labour – Plumstead Common) also asked why a budget of £1.7 million for public realm had seen so much spent yet so few actual changes seen.

There were concerns that so much had also been spent on consultants with few tangible results on the ground.



The market plan on White Hart Road is now scrapped, with a Greenwich Peninsula-based business now set to move to the building in Plumstead. That is taking up £1.4 million of the total budget.

Power station market plan scrapped

Now the council want to spend £2.4 million including Section 106 income.

That’s nice for the private company who seek to move in, and while it’s welcome to see a listed building revamped, spending such a large percentage there is perhaps not what many expected when they were told the run down High Street would be improved.

It’s also rather odd that no Section 106 money could be found for pedestrian improvements from major developments recently approved totalling more than 2,000 homes to help helping residents reach public transport, the railway station and shops.

Plumstead underpass is main link from 2,000 new homes to shops, buses and amenities. No S106 to improve possible according to Greenwich officers

When it comes to assisting people in getting around, reaching public transport, local shops, health services and amenities so often the authority pin most – if not all – responsibility on TfL alone while failing to invest their own Section 106 income.

Aside from failing to use developer income from two large developments around the station area, the Good Growth project also excludes that space.

Greenwich explicitly ignored TfL suggestions to invest Section 106 from two recent developments toward improved and safer connections.

This below in the Plumstead Area Framework has been ignored ever since it was drawn up when it comes to Good Growth funding and Section 106 income.

Plumstead area framework suggested improvement

Prior ideas for Plumstead station using Housing Zone funds also seem forgotten.

It seems for a brief moment the authority were spooked into caring about Plumstead – and then promptly forgot.

Very poor quality public space near Plumstead station and new homes

And now we have a major project where much money already has already been spent on consultants while other areas havn’t begun years behind schedule, and what has been built appears nothing like what was promised. That compounds failing to utilise development income for improvements in other areas.

All eyes on the next regeneration meeting to see if Officers finally answer questions from councillors dating back to July last year.

Greenwich Council have been contacted for comment.

UPDATE: Greenwich Council are refusing to comment on the project.

 

Adverts are far from enough to cover site costs and my rent.

You can support me via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

4 thoughts on “Plumstead High Street: £5.2 million improvement project sees overruns and questions over quality

  • It’s such a shame greenwich are so awful and incompetent. The gyratory has the design of a 1960s motorway instead of a pedestrian focused safe space for pedestrians, bikes and cars to coexist. So many people run across three lanes daily to get to a grassy verge that there are cutouts through the long grass that now make paths. Greenwich ccl really don’t care and its evident in the transport and planning decisions / activities.

    Reply
  • Is it time to bring back The Plumstead Party?
    When action is taken to finally fix up Plumstead High Street, its ill thought out and poorly executed despite fat design consultant fees. Where’s the oversight?
    It is a scandal that Plumstead power station market has been scrapped after spending all that money on renovation and the fixing up of White Hart Road for pedestrian access. No one will be walking there so why did they renovate this obscure road at huge expense?
    It is also incredible that the awful underpass by Plumstead station has no plans to be redesigned/ renovated.

    Reply
  • My heart drops every time the postie leaves a card for me to collect an item from Woolwich sorting office. The pedestrian access to it via the underpass underneath the gyratory is an utter disgrace, grimy and dingy. It is scary at daytime and a no-no when it’s dark. That is the only access on foot! How this is deemed acceptable? And that is supposed to be used by the residents of the future new-builds? The public realm outside Plumstead station isn’t much better. I like the new planted up area. A nice design but not maintained. Was litter covered and overgrown when I saw it last…it had promise…

    Reply
  • Serious answers needed but the silence from inside the council tells its own story. It’s all a mess really. A few shopfronts have changed but most havn’t and won’t according to the most recent update with only a few more to do, a bit of paving at the junction which doesn’t even match existing pavement was installed at the old bus stop and looks shoddy and this lake outside Poundland is turning all the new paving dirty in the area.

    It shows they havn’t a clue about the area as other spaces are far busier than White Hart Road yet they put more effort there than almost all other busy areas. Go figure. No one who lives here, works or visits regularly would prioritise that above revamping for example Lakedale Road shopping area which as far as I can see is getting minimal changes at best. Bizarre.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.