London to see £3.46bn for new affordable homes – though some boroughs pick up the scraps

An announcement was made this week that £3.46bn in Government funding is to be spent on new “affordable homes” across London with the Mayor of London administering funds to various boroughs and Housing Associations.

However, while the Mayor goes big on council housing in press announcements, 43 per cent of funding will not be spent on social housing but instead fund homes at higher rent levels and shared ownership despite chronic lack of supply.

Bid awards from this round saw Greenwich Council awarded £38.1 million for 230 council homes.

That barely scratches the surface of need with 1,400 households in emergency and temporary housing at vast cost, and 23,000 on the council’s waiting list.

The borough is currently ending a four-year plan to build 750 homes – during which time demand has continued to outpace completions.

Other boroughs

The total number of homes planned from the fund over four years from 2021 to 2026 across London is 29,456.

Other boroughs do better when it comes to funding awards than Greenwich, with Lewisham set to see £70 million for 456 “affordable” homes, of which 285 will be council homes.

Newham will receive £91.7 million for 550 homes, of which 500 are council housing.

Bromley is set to see the same as Greenwich at £38.0 million, yet 535 council homes instead of 230 in Greenwich. Pretty odd.

It’ll take some digging to discover why Greenwich have received relatively less than many other boroughs. Did they not request more, which would be odd given rising demand, or was their bid poor?

The council meanwhile has gone on a PR drive about it:

Previous form

The mayor’s document even uses an image of new homes in Plumstead which was a gross underutilisation of a public site. Despite being surrounded by four storey buildings (and taller), Greenwich built low rise two-storey homes and extensive car parking despite a huge shortage of truly affordable homes in the borough.

Low rise Plumstead housing amid taller buildings ensuring more remain in precarious housing

It’ll be interesting to see figures for housing demand in the borough in future council reports, as the last year hasn’t seen many updates for obvious reasons. This was an update in December 2020 showing another increase:

December 2020

Greenwich also has one of the highest rising populations in London, with numbers this week showing people on the electoral role grew 25 per cent increase from 2001 to 2020.

Other London boroughs are set to see less funding than Greenwich such as Hackney, though the same data showed a far smaller population increase.

Housing Associations

The biggest awards are reserved for Housing Associations, though some that will see the most cash have a poor track record.

Clarion are to see £240 million, despite recently being investigated for abysmal maintenance of housing. ITV news recently investigated the group.

Peabody will see £120 million. Perhaps it will speed up their pitifully slow build rate in the Thamesmead Housing Zone. Six years on and most sites havn’t even seen planning applications.

It’s unlikely the money will see many homes from Peabody in Greenwich borough given previous announcements of the group’s future focus which is mainly in Bexley borough.

The total fund will not entirely plug the gap in demand for social housing in London.

The cost of reduced social housing numbers is stark. According to Shelter, “In 2018/19 local authorities in England spent £1.1 billion on temporary accommodation. This figure has increased by 78% over the last five years. Over the same period, the number of households accommodated in temporary accommodation increased by 45%.”

Lewisham alone spent £109 million over four years.

The announcement this week raises three questions.

  1. Government have increased funding but it’s still far behind need. Will that change?
  2. Did the Mayor want 43 per cent of funding to not go towards social housing? Was that a government requirement or a Mayoral decision during discussions?
  3. Why have borough’s like Greenwich received relatively little from the Mayor, when by all accounts demand has rose sharply with resultant cost increases and the borough’s population seeing one of the highest increases in London?

It’s an issue I’ll be digging into over coming weeks and months, and keeping an eye on future bids.

Click here to view the full list of awards for London boroughs.





Adverts are far from enough to cover site costs and my rent.

You can support me via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

6 thoughts on “London to see £3.46bn for new affordable homes – though some boroughs pick up the scraps

  • With the housing waiting list growing on a daily basis in Greenwich £38.1 million is better than no award at all.

    However, 230 council homes will make very little difference to the Boroughs housing waiting list or moving people out of expesive emergency and temporary housing.

    The Mayor of London is in charge of administering funds to various Boroughs and Housing Associations. So makes me wonder why does Greenwich always seem get a bad deal when fuding annouced for the Borough?

  • Sadly the Borough of Greenwich always does.when it comes to funding from the Government, Mayor of London or TFL.

    I do not know if it is because the business cases being put forward for the extra funding are not strong enough or lack vital information which could help secure extra funding.

    Greenwich are always unfairly treated when be awarded all types of funding whether for housing, transport etc.

  • ‘… this round saw Greenwich Council awarded £38.1 million for 230 council homes.’ What the hell? Will there be solid gold taps and marble bathrooms?

  • That is £165k per home. Seems quite a low value per unit for a London new build scheme. Unless the £38.1million is topping up another source of funding I would imagine fairly basic specs.

  • When you break it down, £38.1m doesn’t seem so much money after all. It used to be that council homes had a better spec, but I don’t know if that is true any more.

  • I recorded ‘Surviving squalor: Britain’s housing shame’, but have yet to watch. I expect to be appalled and angered. Rent paying tenants are living in poor conditions and nothing is being done.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.