Greenwich flats approved with £25k for trees – but nothing for pedestrian crossing

Greenwich Council’s Planning Board yesterday approved a new block of flats in Greenwich in their first ever virtual meeting which was streamed on Youtube.

I covered the proposal a couple of times, with the latest being last week.

Since then another thought popped into my mind; this site is located close to a junction that sees a pedestrian crossing without green light sign.

No green light for pedestrians to know when safe to cross

I’d previously covered this crossing when a hotel was approved at the former Greenwich Magistrates Court. The main link between Deptford DLR and the hotel will lack a safe crossing. This plan also ignores the issue. Another large housing block saw no changes from developer income:

Completed 2019. New block is located to the front of this site

The crossing lacks a “green man” to know when to cross, and cars can approach at high speed behind on a bend.

Crossing on left

The crossing is located off a TfL managed junction which muddies the waters somewhat – but it’s not unknown for developer income to head to TfL to work on street alterations.

Possibly a lack of communication is at play. For a long time Greenwich Council have liked to deflect attention to TfL for many issues around public space and street projects. This is despite 95 per cent of the borough’s streets being under local authority control.

It’s an issue we can see currently. With boroughs across the capital already altering streets for social distancing, Greenwich has taken no action. There’s been some subtle hints that it’s up to TfL. TfL themselves have announced projects today, and other boroughs are managing to carry out work.

Greenwich didn’t mention bus lane removal in consultation but did want to retain street clutter further along road

In fact Greenwich have flouted modern street guidance from TfL for some years to the detriment of safety, and even in a recent consultation on cycle highway 4 through Deptford did the same by asking for street clutter to be retained at Creek Road. Lewisham Council advocated for feeder cycle lanes. TfL are to fund it.

There is however this mention in the document: “Contributions towards improving cycle facilities in the area and toward cycle training consistent with the Council’s Cycling Strategy and SPD requirements” though there’s no details of funding nor projects, not details on any other possible improvements.

Aside from nearby crossings, £25,000 is be spent on trees though one existing tree will be removed.




Running a site takes much time and cost a lot of money. Adverts are far from enough to cover it and my rent.

You can support me and the running this site in a number of ways including Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

    2 thoughts on “Greenwich flats approved with £25k for trees – but nothing for pedestrian crossing

    • Pedestrian safety as to be paramount at all times. All traffic signals by now show have the green filter lights fitted to them so pedestrians know when it is safe to cross. Also the countdown timings should be increased by a fewmore seconds to givve the ellderly disabled and people with children more time to cross.

      All traffic lights should also be set to squence filtering so rows of traffic move in turn with out the need to criss cross each other which would also improve safety for both road users and pedestrians.

      This said this does not take in to account the increase in drivers who jump red lights as they think the rules do not apply to them.

    • Sorry about the typo’s my keyboard keeps get stuck.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.