Deptford High Street to see major changes from 2017


Lewisham Council plan more extensive alterations to Deptford High Street from 2017. This time it’ll be the north end that’s worked on with £2.42 million spent over the next couple of years.

It follows on from various large-scale projects along the street in recent years including revamping the southern end, creating a new square and associated Deptford Lounge plus a rebuilt station with adjacent Deptford Market Yard development, which has just completed.

Plans are shown in Lewisham Council’s 2017/18 Local Implementation Plan proposals. This is money that all London Councils receive to spend on transport and streets across the capital. Lewisham will receive £2.8 million next year from TfL.

In addition to this annual amount, more money can be allocated to Major Schemes. Deptford has been designated as such.

Why spend there?

A reason given for focusing on the north end are the numerous large housing developments which will increase the number of pedestrian walking to the station. These include:

  • Convoys Wharf. 3500 homes.
  • Timberyard. 1100 homes.
  • Marine Wharf. 700 homes.
  • Greenland Place. 679 homes.
  • Former Deptford Green school. 120 homes. In for planning on 29th September.

“The Convoys Wharf and other major developments such as Marine Wharf will substantially increase pedestrian movements in the area both for commuting and leisure. The northern end of Deptford High Street will form an important pedestrian link to Deptford Station, Wavelengths Swimming/Leisure Pools and Library as well as the shops, restaurants and street market.”

Ideas floated include making the north end of the High Street one-way. Blogs such as Deptford Dame have previously highlighted how the north end of Deptford High Street has become a traffic-clogged rat runs, with numerous examples of cars parking and driving over pavements. She commented on previous consultations here and hopefully many points raised will be considered.

The report states:

“The northern section also contains a large number of shops but remains a busy two-way traffic route with some kerbside limited time parking. Although the footway paving itself is relatively new the footways are narrow and offer a poor pedestrian environment that is exacerbated by the effects of a large amount of passing traffic. The passing traffic is particularly heavy in the peak periods where the road forms part of an east-west cut through from Deptford Church Street to the Rotherhithe area, and a one-way scheme for the high street will be considered through consultation.”

There were also many good proposals though from the earlier consultation, including:

  • Removing unnecessary street furniture
  • Improving the crossing with Evelyn Street and excessive street furniture there
  • Improved pavements by using quality paving materials and providing level crossing areas at junctions
  • Improved lighting under the railway

All this activity in the area does make it appear silly that Southeastern still regard the station as the backwater it used to be, rather than the busy place it now is. Passenger numbers have grown from 300k a year in 2004/5 to 1.2 million in 2014/15.

Will station staff levels change? Well, if TfL takeover almost certainly. They would staff from first to last train at the very least. Another reason to campaign for it as the Government looks like going cold on the idea.

Church Street

Work is also being considered on nearby Deptford Church Street. This is a four lane road with two dedicated bus lanes. It has previously been suggested that it becomes two lanes. This would slow down buses and not be a wise move. A better option is to remove the central reservation and fencing, use the reclaimed space to widen paving or add in segregated cycle lanes, and possibly add in additional crossings.



Across Lewisham borough

A whole bunch of other local town centres and shopping parades across Lewisham borough will also see smaller improvement next year across Lewisham borough, including. Unlike Deptford High Street, which is classified as a major project, many of these come under the standard Local Implementation Plan funds under the “corridors, neighbourhoods and supporting measure” where councils have a fair bit of leeway to choose spending priorities. Lewisham choose improving town centres, including:

  • Coulgate Street, Brockley. £360k.
  • Dartmouth Road North, Forest Hill. £1.5 million over two years.
  • Crofton Park Corridor. £1.7 million over three years.
  • Sangley Road / Sandhurst Road Improvements, Catford. £618k over two years.
  • Manor Lane Neighbourhood Improvements,  Hither Green. The shopping parade is seeing £430k spent on improvements.
  • Grove Park. £160k, with focus on:

“Baring Road, including the train station, bus interchange, local shopping parade and the Baring Hall Hotel. The current layout is highly dominated by vehicular traffic, and the existing footways and forecourts are marred by unsightly high containment kerbs and railings.”

  • Hither Green Local Traffic Corridor. £50k.

Lewisham v Greenwich

The detail shown in Lewisham Council documents on funding and spending is a mile away from what happens in Greenwich Council. In case you were wondering if Greenwich Council have publicly revealed their intentions for 2017/18? Nope. Any sign it will be shown soon? Nope.

Here’s Lewisham: 24 pages broken down by projects, aims and the thinking behind funding.

Here’s Greenwich’s from last year. Compare and contrast. Just 3 pages and little detail.

Despite the amount running into millions, Greenwich’s LIP spending in 2016/17 was authorised by Councillors with barely any questions asked after being placed before Highway’s Committee shortly before the start of the financial year.

Will that change this year? Will transparency increase and Councillors ask for more information? It’s clear that 10 years of funding have not improved a great deal of busy public areas, such as shopping parades, across the length of the borough. Lewisham have plans to improve at least seven alone in 2017/18. It will be interesting to see how many Greenwich Council decides to improve.

April 2016 Update: Seven months on and Greenwich Council STILL havn’t given any more details of plans. Lewisham Council had a whole list back in September 2016.

Greenwich Council’s Highways Department are badly letting residents down. Greenwich Councillor Sizwe James is in charge of this area under his remit of Transport, Economy and Smart Cities. He can be emailed at

He is a decent guy by many accounts but will he ensure this failing department works for its residents?

Adverts are far from enough to cover site costs and my rent.

You can support me via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

3 thoughts on “Deptford High Street to see major changes from 2017

  • Is it any surprise Greenwich Council don’t reveal their plans, or just a very brief outline? They don’t seem to want people to know what’s happening or show transparency. The crazy thing is they could portray this money as doing great work at various towns.

    But then again, looking at the very poor condition of many town centres they clearly havn’t been spending this money in many places, despite millions available each year for over a decade now. That could be why they hide it away. I’m not talking about the major schemes by the way, which are visible, but bread and butter town improvement projects, which as you show many other councils also do.

    The question is – where has it all gone? Looking at their document doesn’t show anything other councils havn’t done but others have also improved town centres. I’ve seen good work in other councils like Croydon too.

  • lack of transparency = something to hide = possible corruption

    not a good sign, sadly and this would not change unless someone report or get media interests

  • Pingback: Greenwich Council to recieve more millions from TfL | fromthemurkydepths

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.