New Woolwich Ferry: Disastrous introduction and silence from TfL

New Woolwich Ferry: Disastrous introduction and silence from TfL

There was no ribbon cutting when new ferries begun service on the Woolwich Ferry earlier this year. The Mayors – of London, Newham and Greenwich borough – didn’t show to celebrate the occasion and toast the new arrivals.

That’s probably because no proper service has ever actually started. After months of delay missing a January 2019 opening, a tentative “trial” begun – and that’s how its remained.

Courtesy TfL

The last few days have seen numerous ferry failures culminating in no service again today and none all weekend.

https://twitter.com/TfLTrafficNews/status/1157303327593570304

Now, just about every new transport mode suffers issues in the early days. Hands are wrung, brows furrowed and things improve in time. But even by the standards of other boats, ferries, trains and aircraft it’s been a torrid time.

When new ferries were ordered only two were procured to replace three previous vessels. One was always spare before. Now there is no slack.

Former ferry

Workers on the ferry have contacted to say issues are numerous – and industrial relations are on the floor with strike action also occurring.

What’s worse is the silence from all concerned. TfL and borough council’s have barely uttered a word on what issues are and what is being done about it.

That leaves a service that no one relies on, and no one appears to have any faith will improve soon.

 

--------

I run the site myself and pay all hosting and ongoing fees. If you want to help, you can make a one off donation or become a regular supporter here

You can also contribute via my Patreon account by clicking here

Murky Depths

7 thoughts on “New Woolwich Ferry: Disastrous introduction and silence from TfL

  1. Also doesn’t help that there are ongoing issues with the foot tunnel lifts making it difficult for pedestrians and cyclists trying to get across.

  2. I suspect the councils want to bleed the ferry service out and thus show the “requirement” for the additional tunnel

  3. As with any public transport service whether it be bus train or boat. There should always be additional buses, trains and in this case ferries available (spare) which can be used to replace a broken down ferry if one is taken out of service.

    I think TFL did not take this in to account when ordering the new ferries hence why we have some of the problems we are experiencing now with the ferry. The ferry often operates with a one ferry service causing long delays in the area.

    In recent consultations people made it clear they wanted to keep the Woolwich Ferry in Woolwich even if the new Silvertown Tunnel goes ahead in the future.

  4. Phew, seems I may have got there just in time for the last one. I’d just dropped a friend at City Airport and was returning southwards, and was on the boat when he phoned to say he’d boarded but check in had disallowed a piece of luggage: could I go back to get it? I disembarked and turned round, and was told I could board but it was the last service. I had little idea how prophetic those words would be

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies and asks your personal data to enhance your browsing experience.