Towers approved at Ruby Triangle on the Old Kent Road – the start of massive change?

Southwark Council this week approved towers containing over 1,000 flats at the Ruby Street triangle site on the Old Kent Road.

The forthcoming Bakerloo Line extension is a big factor in this scheme. A station is planned near the site – though the extension could still be 12 years from opening.

The tallest building tops out at 170 metres and 48 floors. It’s set back from the main road. This is one of the main issues with designs like Spray street at Woolwich. Tall buildings are crammed right against the street with minimal setback creating a canyon effect.

Spray Street plans in Woolwich

Plans on the Old Kent Road have been contentious as some businesses will lose premises with employment land reducing.

Balanced against that is the argument that new homes are badly needed and the Old Kent Road has long been underutilised and not befitting a Zone 2 site near central London.

Courtesy Google. Current site from the Old Kent Road

It has a huge amount of single-storey retail sheds and car parks. Part of the Ruby Road site is an Enterprise car yard. If renders are accurate they will occupy ground floor areas in the development.

A car rental site may seem unlikely on such a development but I’ve seen similar in high density cities abroad so it may survive to completion.

There have been issues of existing smaller business not being offered suitable alternative sites – an issue that also appears at Spray Street in Woolwich.


I’m quite taken with the design and its late 19th Century  / early 20th Century New York look. The colour pallet and materials all appeal, and massing is good.

It wouldn’t be a mention of the area without an obligatory mention of it being the cheapest place on a Monopoly board, and now that’s out the way we can move on and see that huge changes are on the cards which could change that “cheap” status for good.

There’s no doubt the Old Kent Road will change massively in the next 10 years – and it needs to. Not many major world cities have such poorly designed major avenues near their centre. The road is very wide for most of its length befitting an avenue, heads straight into Zone 1 and should be aiming to compete with the great streets of New York, Barcelona, Paris and others in terms of density.

Whilst redevelopment to provide homes is welcome, the usual caveats apply. Many must be truly affordable and local businesses supported. The big boys like Asda and Tesco also have a role to play in developing land in a far more efficient way to assist with London’s housing crises.

A large number of plans are in motion in the area which I’ll cover in more depth soon. This area of south east London will undergo massive change.

Running a site alone takes time and a fair bit of money. Adverts are far from enough to cover it and my living costs as a private renter.

You can support me including via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

    3 thoughts on “Towers approved at Ruby Triangle on the Old Kent Road – the start of massive change?

    • as a fan of Barca and good European cities eg Hamburg, Lyon, Geneva, Turin, & a fan of your blog, I am completely mystified as to why “we” have to compete with continental counterparts on density. Density? Are you sure that’s what we must tackle to catch up? It’s not the Champions League.

      In fact, historically, there’s plenty of evidence that modestly size plots built out as vertically separated buildings is a commonplace particularly across northern Europe. A systemised version of that was what Rasmussen thought so terrifc about London in the 30s. And no, I’m not a Creationist Streeter.

      As for the Mattel Toys Inc NYC look, spare me. It’s very old hat and always turns out tacky and inauthentic.

      I agree about the existing shed urbanism leaving much to be desired. And thanks for speaking up for business premises threatened by the redevelopment.

      This is classic catastrophe urbanism: hitting the area like a tsunami. The do-it quickest agenda of the developer (I know it’s not that quick) guarantees a bleak outcome. As for the extraordinary difficulties of maintaining high towers, nothing could be less sustainable.

      Truly the urbanism of big money snapping its fingers

      • sorry, but that’s one of the most terrible rambles seen on this site. Why ‘compete’? London is a capital and the Old Kent Road is near to or actually a ghetto. The impressive wide infrastructure is important and needs to be used properly and the wider area wisely. OKR won’t (most likely) become a tourist hotspot, but locally it is vital to ‘be looked after’

    • The shorter building design is quite attractive and it’s a pity that there can’t be more of them. However, I suspect that this will be just another development parachuted into a cheap part of London and left to fend for itself.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.