Poor street design is a continual issue on this site. It’s something Greenwich Council tend to excel in, with very dated design and bizarre choices often made with street layouts at great expense.
They just love a bollard. Stick ’em up anywhere. Everywhere. It doesn’t actually need to serve a purpose. Just spend a few hundred quid a piece. As an example, at what stage did anyone ever think this was a good idea?
The funny thing is, this indiscriminate positioning was done to protect against pavement parking. Yet some drivers park on double yellows, dropped kerb crossings and “keep clear” markings all day and never get a ticket. It’s often the way in Greenwich; do not regularly enforce issues (if at all) but use some clumsy tool that doesn’t fix a problem yet brings negative side effects.
In this case it’s a visual mess and does nothing to improve the reputation or appearance of a blighted area. This is the first impression when leaving the rail station. Put a load of obstacles near a station entrance with very high footfall. Great work.
They will soon go as Crossrail work brings a revamp but when it passes back to Greenwich’s control will the clutter on the street crop back over time?
Here’s another bollard bonanza:
Why use money to improve the scruffy space behind when you can use it for more street clutter instead?
And here’s another ensemble which failed at its only job:
Over in Greenwich town centre and that other bugbear – excessive guardrails – do their best to make some crossings as difficult as possible for pedestrians.
A pedestrian crossing from the left side of the street over to the right at this spot is forced into the next street before being allowed to cross, and the place to do so is a designated car parking spot – as can be seen above with the white outlines on the road.
Pedestrians better hope there’s no parked cars. As shown above, this isn’t often the case. Presumably these railings are for safety yet they force pedestrians to cross and emerge between parked cars. And if you have kids in a buggy, or in a wheelchair? Good luck getting between parked cars.
The above pic was from a couple of years ago. I was there last week and it hasn’t changed. I’m not sure if they’ve stripped the paint or these are replacements. Let’s hope they didn’t spend thousands installing replacements.
Pedestrians, especially the disabled, elderly and parents are completely reliant on cars not utilising marked bays here. There wasn’t many cars on the occasion above as it was a Sunday. Far from the case at other times.
In reality what happens in such a scenario is that people walk in the road to avoid detours. And on a wider level if pedestrians are forced into detours at many junctions and crossings it cumulatively makes walking less appealing. For the elderly or disabled on crutches, for example, staying home might be preferable or even forced upon them due to shoddy and inconsiderate design.
No authority is perfect at this kind of thing – many council Highway Department’s make silly mistakes but many carry out audits and remove mistakes from the past. TfL did a lot of this the past decade. Regulation and rules change and so some things that were previously needed can be taken out. The issue in Greenwich borough is this doesn’t usually happen and they continue abiding by anti-pedestrian rules from the distant past and adding to the problem.
The end result? Streets are cluttered, ugly and off-putting whilst walking is discouraged. Vulnerable street users are dicing with poor design. Routine design guidance for Greenwich Highway’s staff really needs dragging into the 21st Century. Think of Plumstead station and High Street. It is not a well functioning department that has overseen that mess.
Only big multi-million pound schemes with strong external guidance shows modern thought. It then passes to Greenwich and they generally mess them up. See Woolwich’s multi-million pound squares becoming a car park within weeks. They then went on another bollard frenzy with no thought for existing bollards. One or two selective extra installations would have stopped it along with parking enforcement.
Routine day-to-day work in the hands of Greenwich Council show no sign of improving.
TfL’s millions of pounds this financial year given to Greenwich Council could also improve many streets. Instead we are more likely to see extra street interventions which exacerbate the problems.
The Greenwich Councillor in charge of “Transport, Economy and Smart Cities” is Sizwe James, who represents Labour in Thamesmead Moorings. I presume the Highways Department comes under his remit. Happy to be corrected on that if wrong. He’s not been in the job long so can’t be blamed for the failures of the past, but if he is responsible then a friendly word with management in the department would help. The department needs a shake-up.
There is a Highways Committee led by Aidan Smith, Labour Councillor for Greenwich West. It seems to have a narrow remit. Last year it nodded through spending of TfL’s £3.5 million annual funding to Greenwich Council with few details of forthcoming schemes being available. A year later what has been achieved in terms of public realm improvements? The same appears to be happening again this year.
Greenwich should be following TfL’s streetscape guidance. Yet most TfL guidance is contradicted by Greenwich Council practices who still abide by working practices from decades ago.
If you have any good examples of poor street design email them to email@example.com
There’s a good Twitter account called @bollocksinfra covering this kind of crap design.
UPDATE: Here’s a good example of pointless waste.
A bollard stuck on a pavement that narrows paving that often has bins out yet it doesn’t do a thing about parking. Any driver could drive a few feet forward. Double yellows would work if the aim was stopping parking. Wheelchair users, the blind and parents with buggies particularly have to contend with something that’s pointless.
This has cost a fair bit of money to do – hundreds if not thousands – when there’s pressing need elsewhere. These type of bollards are one of the most expensive on the market even though they weather badly within months and often look a mess. They tend to dry and crack or simply get knocked out of shape as they lack much rigidity.
On your average Greenwich street you’ll see many of these placed at random. Compare and contrast to most other authorities when in your average Bexley or Lewisham street -and they don’t go crazy with them. What is the reason Greenwich Highway’s Department put so many in?
I’ve asked Greenwich Councillors in senior positions what the HIghway’s Department are playing at. Let’s see if they respond. I expect some waffle from the Department about safety and the like when we know this does nothing and much of it contradicts TfL’s own guidance. Will Councillors swallow what the Department trot out?