Hundreds of Greenwich Peninsula residents call for street improvements

A recent council meeting saw residents of Greenwich Peninsula call for streets changes to improve their area.

A petition containing 334 signatures was presented to the authority’s Highway Committee as residents raised issues such as a lack of crossing points, speed limits and lorries using residential streets at West Parkside and Peartree Way.

The area sits in Greenwich Millennium Village which has seen on ongoing number of plots built and commence in the recent past.

Entrance to Peartree Way ahead. Dual carriageways and poor crossings nearby

The petition states:

We, the undersigned, call upon the Royal Borough of Greenwich, in co-operation with Greenwich Millennium Village Ltd, to ensure that Peartree Way is restricted to 20mph and has a 7.5 tonne vehicle limit apart from access.

Further, we call for a dropped kerb and quality crossing points at the Southern end of Peartree Way to assist school children and other pedestrians crossing.

Local streets. GMV site entrance is to left

We ask for clear signage and appropriate entry treatment at the junction for Peartree Way and Horn Link Way.

We ask for appropriate measures to ensure excellent road safety and healthy streets throughout GMV. In a speech, one resident stated that poor parking is an issue. She mentioned that parking attendants are rarely seen nor do they sometimes act when they do arrive.

A resident spoke to councillors and the council’s head of Highways, stating that when residents actively contact the council regarding poor parking and to a lack of routine patrols, the time to respond can be days.

Google image.

They also raised the failure to adopt a dropped kerb at pedestrian crossing points on an approved estate plan.

In addition, a width restriction for developer lorries was removed and not reinstated despite that plot being completed four years ago.

Peartree Way looking to GMV. Both arms of roundabout here and the other side lack any signalled or zebra crossing. Shops on right and behind

In response to Greenwich Council’s Highway department raising evening-only restrictions on traffic, the response was “we are not a nocturnal community”.

They stated a 20mph limit will be in place sometime in the future, with a width restriction set to be reintroduced.

Greenwich again stated they dependent on outside funding.  You wouldn’t know there’s vast number of new developments in the immediate area, with more set to be approved.

The latest statement on S106 shows £10,570,215.29 unallocated borough-wide.

Cllr Majid Rahman (East Greenwich) stated he has had to carry his niece as cars speed off the roundabout into Peartree Way at high speed. There is no signalised or zebra crossing here.

Poor crossings in area of major housing growth

There is however much guardrail cementing the dominance of vehicles in an rapidly urbanising area with ever more pedestrian footfall.

The meeting followed the usual pattern; Greenwich officers claiming lack of funds and lack of powers while failing to mention where they can raise funds and do have powers.

It was pretty much all down to TfL again. No mention they’ll look into S106 revenue and in future CIL funds, nor any surplus from parking and CCTV revenue ringfenced to transport.

The Planning department bears responsibility alongside Highways. Much housing has been approved yet little thought for incoming residents nor funding allocated from agreement between the council and developers.

 

Adverts are far from enough to cover site costs and my rent.

You can support me via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

7 thoughts on “Hundreds of Greenwich Peninsula residents call for street improvements

  • It’s the same old story. Officers are a law unto themselves and Councillors seem powerless to make them comply. Why?

    Reply
  • Local elections not too far off, let’s make them count this time, came close with Greens in EG recently, lets make it a Green North Greenwich Borough with Motorists sticking to the South of borough, where cars are the only or sadly the best option in some places for some journeys. Better still cut the borough in half. We’d beat Labour then.

    Reply
  • It does seem like departmental managers have little knowledge of how the borough is changing and if anything seem determined to hold back change.

    Shouldn’t we also look at the top brass in this borough like the Chief Exec? They’ve presided over millions in squandered or lost income.

    Reply
  • We had the local elections last year. The next local elections will take place in 2026, so some way off.

    Reply
  • Greenwich Councillors need to listen to residents more. This area is in urgent need of road improvements better crossings and speed limits. Councillor Raham is right in what he says about the speed at which some drivers drive. Also Pear Tree leads on to the notorious Angerstein roundabout.

    Reply
  • I agree that the council’s got too comfortable a seat. One gets the impression they don’t listen or try to improve because they they don’t have to.

    Reply
  • The lack of pedestrian options are severely holding back the Greenwich peninsula. Where is the positive message of development being sent? A council/Borough with a clear plan to support communities and businesses by drawing up even half considered plans would be the envy of developers and families throughout London.
    There’s some very obvious cheap and quick wins the council could do (many outlined on this blog) yet nothing. Why?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.