Woolwich Elizabeth line station set to see 523 homes in four towers approved

Greenwich planners have recommended that hundreds of homes be approved over the eastern side of Woolwich Elizabeth line station.

Berkeley Homes and Transport For London are behind the application named Armourers Court which includes 523 homes.

Four blocks above podium

Four blocks will sit around a podium above the Crossrail site, with the tallest at 26 floors.

Greenwich Council and local residents are set to again miss out again on a large chunk of income from developers given low rates applied on developers under the Community Infrastructure Levy, which they failed to revise in 2018 despite a promise in 2015.

The site sits beside a wide dual carriageway that despite numerous developments along its length including Woolwich Exchange approved over the road, serves to help sever the two side of Woolwich with the authority failing to use income to improve.

Woolwich Exchange development will sit on right. Armourers Court on left

No income from a variety of Woolwich developments has seen money allocated to improve this stretch of road.

Woolwich Exchange will see 801 homes, shops and a cinema.

Woolwich Exchange plans approved opposite

A previous application at Armourers Court was approved on the 1st April 2015 for the construction of 394 residential units.

That never progressed.

Armorers Court plan in 2015

The site sits above the eastern end of Woolwich station and an existing ventilation shaft.

Woolwich station

Despite how busy Woolwich station already is, there’s no plan for a second station entrance to aid people here or at a large number of developments to the east, including those at a rebuilt college site (294 homes), West Thamesmead Gateway (1,750 homes) and a car home rebuild (333 homes).

Approved to the east

There’s many other sites that could be coming to fruition in coming years to the east. Some are part of Peabody’s Housing Zone while others are included in Greenwich Council’s Land Allocation strategy.

Since opening Woolwich station has been near Canary Wharf levels of usage, and saw 694,650 passenger journeys in August alone.

Cycling to the station is not exactly enticing at the moment with limited cycle spaces around Woolwich station and a road that couldn’t be more offputting.

Lined by new development

Within the report set to go before councillors, we again see Greenwich’s Highways team suggest vague ideas while TfL seem on the ball with specific queries.

TfL noted that a proposed pedestrian crossing did not align to desire lines for pedestrians.

Transport for London also state a “failure to consider eastbound cyclists, lane widths of 3.2m-3.9m should be avoided”.

When plans were submitted I highlighted how plans failed to include space for a dedicated cycle lane that could link to the existing lane to the east.

Site footprint left narrow pavement and no space for cycle lane to link with existing just east

Other TfL objections include:

Proposal fails to find a suitable balance between servicing requirements and policy requirement to provide good quality public realm and an attractive cycling and walking environment.”

“In addition, Arsenal Way proposed planting and level changes not considered to be in line with London Plan policy D8 or the Healthy Streets approach”

The report also states in comments from TfL:

“Due to deficiencies in the Active Travel Zone Assessment a contribution toward improvements to walking is also justified.”

Space for dedicated cycle lane reduced by landscaping

TfL suggested a cycle route along Arsenal Way. It’s stated there is insufficient space.

The Woolwich town centre manager popped up with more useful suggestions.


Housing totals include 340 private units and 183, or 35%, as “affordable”.

That is divided with 128 units at London Affordable Rent (closest to social housing now possible in vast majority of cases) and 55 units at shared ownership.

Current site appearance

Commercial space has been reduced from earlier plans with overall levels reduced from 1,760sqm to 1,536sqm.

This proposal follows a large number in Woolwich that have all failed to bring possible amounts of income to benefit local residents and services, including:

Woolwich Exchange

Woolwich Exchange

Woolwich Central Phase 3 and 4

View from John Wilson Street

Leisure Centre & Housing site

Woolwich leisure centre plan include hundreds of homes

Woolwich Catholic Club

View from Arsenal site

Building 11 on Royal Arsenal

Building 11 deviated from Masterplan

Other large sites in Woolwich are not liable to pay Community Infrastructure Levy if approved before 2015. Changes to Masterplans since that result in net increase are liable.

Woolwich towers

And that’s not mentioning others beyond a few hundred metre radius.

Unusually in this report, Greenwich Planners have not included Section 106 allocations.

I will keep checking and update this post accordingly when they do. It’ll be interesting to see if any notice is taken of the recently adopted Transport Strategy following little notice taken of previous reports and strategies supposed to encourage active travel.

UPDATE: Plans were approved and Section 106 allocated thus:


Adverts are far from enough to cover site costs and my rent.

You can support me via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

One thought on “Woolwich Elizabeth line station set to see 523 homes in four towers approved

  • A significant contribution to the cost of a second entrance to the Crossrail station should be the bare minimum for this development to go ahead. Or something approaching the required social housing quota. Greenwich council will get neither.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.