Greenwich Tories seek to scrap London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone – despite their own Transport Minister insisting upon it

Greenwich Conservatives are seeking to remove the planned expansion of the Ultra Low Emission Zone to Woolwich and Eltham as seen in a motion put before a full council meeting next week. This is despite their fellow Conservative Transport Minister Grant Shapps insisting it happens as part of a funding agreement with TfL.

ULEZ is due to expand to the south circular later this year, with a letter sent from Grant Shapps as part of the funding agreement for TfL (see from page 66 of the link) clearly stating this requirement:

ULEZ mentioned in Grant Shapps letter

The Tories’ motion states: “Council calls on the Leader of the Council to write to the incumbent Mayor to demand he scrap the extension of the ULEZ and instead create a London Clean Air Fund for Boroughs and community groups to bid for funding from.”

It is also the case that the current Prime Minister appears keen on ULEZ and when Mayor, Boris Johnson sought to introduce the original ULEZ zone.

We’ve seen a lot of this in recent months with the Conservative’s Mayoral candidate Shaun Bailey continually stating London’s Mayor should axe schemes – yet conveniently ignoring the vast majority emanates from the Department for Transport and Grant Shapps – and rather awkwardly has all been made public. Shapps has also pushed for active travel plans:

Shapps letter

That’s not to say the Conservatives in Greenwich do not make some relevant points. They state: “Moreover there is a risk of communities just outside of ULEZ (such as Eltham, New Eltham, Woolwich and Plumstead) suffering significant negative impact as road users look to avoid paying the charge by utilising the roads on the boundary of the zone. Additionally, there is a risk that large businesses reshuffle commercial fleets to run more polluting end of life vehicles outside of ULEZ, bringing with it a deterioration in air quality.”

Greenwich Tories support Silvertown despite traffic projections seeing congestion increases in parts of Eltham. Note red dots along A2 and A20

This is a risk, with more polluting vehicles staying outside in those areas. However they support the Silvertown Tunnel with a dedicated lane planned for lorries and HGVs currently excluded from Blackwall.

They also state support for “extending Santander Cycles, and work with neighbouring boroughs and the GLA to assess the levels of non-commercial commuter traffic from outside the Borough. Depending on these results, Council should look to work with neighbouring boroughs to reduce non-commercial journeys that do not bring a benefit to the Royal Borough of Greenwich. Council will carry out a clear equalities impact assessment prior to the implementation of any changes, and will not proceed if it is found they would negatively impact disadvantaged or disabled groups.”

How the authority can reduce commercial journeys from outside the borough while supporting Silvertown and opposing fees for polluting vehicles is not made entirely clear with a vague statement for funding to “act as a pot to fund targeted and tangible clean air initiatives with proven results across London.”




Adverts are far from enough to cover site costs and my rent.

You can support me via Paypal here

Another option is via Patreon by clicking here

You can also buy me a beer/coffee at Ko-fi here

There's also a Facebook page for the site here

Many thanks

J Smith

I've lived in south east London most of my life growing up in Greenwich borough and working in the area for many years. The site has contributors on occasion and we cover many different topics. Living and working in the area offers an insight into what is happening locally.

One thought on “Greenwich Tories seek to scrap London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone – despite their own Transport Minister insisting upon it

  • Go green, vote blue. Remember that?

    Who are they targeting with these anti-anti-pollution measures? I would rather that I didn’t have to breath fumes from old polluting cars, but who is driving them and are they likely to vote tory? Or is it that they just wish to be seen to oppose these kind of schemes in general (regardless of it being their own minister who mandated them)?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.